Objective:
This study assessed current clinical practices of clinicians related to hemophilia treatment guidelines to identify knowledge, competency, practice gaps and barriers to optimal care of patients with inhibitors.
Methods:
A continuing medical education (CME)-certified clinical practice assessment survey was developed comprising 24 knowledge- and case-based, multiple-choice questions. The survey assessed knowledge, attitudes, and confidence with regard to newly-developed hemophilia treatment guidelines emphasizing integrated care for patients with inhibitors, and the application of these guideline-based recommendations. The survey launched on the Medscape Education website on December 5, 2016 with participant responses collected through January 26, 2017. The data sample includes responses from 170 physicians who participated during the study period.
Summary of Results (n=170 physicians):
Responses to questions on the screening for, and management of, inhibitor formation in patients with hemophilia undergoing prophylaxis, showed that: the majority of hematologists/oncologists correctly identified the factors that increase risk of inhibitor formation (71%), while less than half of pediatricians did so (46%); when asked regarding exposure days (EDs) and the formation of inhibitors, half of hematologists/oncologists correctly identified within 50 EDs, while only 25% of pediatricians did so; and both hematologists/oncologists (21%) and pediatricians (28%) incorrectly identified how often a patient should be tested for inhibitors. When surveyed specifically regarding immune tolerance induction (ITI), a slight majority of hematologists/oncologists and pediatricians correctly chose the time frame during which to initiate ITI (55% and 51%, respectively), and 50% of hematologists/oncologists knew the most powerful predictor of ITI success, while only 42% of pediatricians did so; only 14% of hematologists/oncologists and 4% of pediatricians knew that there is no optimal rFVIII to initiate for ITI; only 10% of hematologists/oncologists and 8% of pediatricians knew that there is not optimal dose of rFVIII to initiate for ITI.
Conclusions:
The need for further education was observed for the following topics: best practices in the integrative care of patients using evidence-based guidelines and recommendations; current and emerging clinical data guiding acute and prophylactic management; risk factors for the development of inhibitors during prophylaxis; screening and management of inhibitor formation, including ITI. Further educational efforts tailored to address these gaps are warranted.
Objective:
My Life, Our Future (MLOF) seeks to advance understanding of hemophilia by developing the MLOF Research Repository, a resource for use in scientific study. To strengthen the database and improve clinical care for females, MLOF expanded in 2016 to collect data and samples from potential and confirmed carriers.
Methods:
MLOF is a collaboration between the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network (ATHN) (educates HCPs, collects and protects genetic data, manages ATHNdataset, manages research review committee), Bloodworks Northwest (BWNW) (performs genetic testing and analysis, manages MLOF Research Repository), National Hemophilia Foundation (educates patients and the community), and Bioverativ (provides scientific collaboration and sponsorship). Patients enrolled in MLOF can contribute their de-identified clinical information and specimens (DNA, RNA, plasma and serum) to the MLOF Research Repository. The patients’ hemophilic genetic data (F8 or F9 variant) and specimens are stored at BWNW and their clinical data in the ATHNdataset. For carrier project participants, an ISTH Bleeding Assessment Tool score is determined, and for confirmed carriers factor levels are obtained and recorded in ATHN Clinical Manager. Upon enrollment of 5,000 participants, the MLOF Research Repository was opened to U.S-based investigators in February 2017. Investigators were encouraged to partner with a participating hemophilia treatment center (HTC) on projects for clinical translational support. An independent, international, multidisciplinary panel of experts was convened to review research proposals, evaluating project feasibility, scientific merit and potential contribution to the bleeding disorders community.
Summary:
To date, 97 HTCs are actively participating in MLOF and have enrolled 8,246 patients. Of those, 83% (6,857), including 723 confirmed carriers, have consented to research. The samples of 427 additional females consenting to research are pending evaluation; 1,643 females have participated in MLOF. The first MLOF Research Repository cycle received 9 Letters of Intent and 7 were chosen for full proposal review. The final selection of studies will be announced to the community in June 2017.
Conclusions:
Combining and analyzing genetic and clinical data via this database may allow researchers to solve unmet needs in patients with hemophilia, including understanding inhibitor development, bleeding severity or aiding in identifying new therapeutic targets. By considering molecular drivers of disease and genetic variability, this approach could lead to more individualized treatment through advancement of precision medicine. Global expansion of the MLOF Research Repository is planned for 2018. Carrier testing may help females manage their bleeding disorder and may aid in family planning. Related to research, females provide a unique control group for males with hemophilia on natural history, modifier genes inside and outside the coagulation system, and epigenetic factors affecting outcomes.
Objective:
Patients with hereditary bleeding disorders have been included in Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of sofosbuvir (SOF), ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) as well as in a dedicated study (n = 120) in this patient population. This integrated analysis evaluates the safety and efficacy of SOF-based regimens in HCV-infected patients with hereditary bleeding disorders.
Methods:
HCV-infected patients with a medical history of a hereditary bleeding disorder who participated in a SOF-based Phase 2 or 3 study were included in this pooled analysis. Medical history term(s) used to identify patients with bleeding disorders included variations of Hemophilia A or B, Von Willebrand’s Disease, Factor Deficiencies, or conditions associated with hemophilia.
Summary:
A total of 201 patients (74 GT1, 10% GT2, 14% GT3, 2% GT4, <1% GT5) with bleeding disorders were identified across 19 studies. The majority were male (91%), Caucasian (82%), IL28B non-CC (70%), HCV treatment-naïve (55%), and without cirrhosis (74%). Hemophilia A (65%) and B (26%) were the most common bleeding disorders. SVR12 results are shown in the below table by treatment regimen and genotype. The most frequently reported adverse events (>10%) were fatigue and headache; majority were mild or moderate in severity. One patient (<1%) discontinued LDV/SOF due to an adverse event and 11 patients (5%) experienced a serious adverse event. Hemarthrosis, muscle hemorrhage, epistaxis, hematoma, and hematuria were the only hemorrhagic events that occurred in >1 patient. Grade 3 or 4 laboratory abnormalities were infrequent with anemia and hyperbilirubinemia the most frequent Grade 3 laboratory abnormality consistent with RBV administration.
Conclusions:
SOF-based regimens led to high rates of SVR in genotype 1–5 HCV infected patients with bleeding disorders. SOF-based regimens were safe and well tolerated with no new toxicity specific to patients with bleeding disorders emerging
.
Background:
Hemophilia is an inherited bleeding disorder caused by an impairment in the body’s ability to accomplish the natural clotting process. People with hemophilia experience bleeds because there is an inadequate amount of thrombin due to a deficiency in factor VIII or IX. Thrombin is critical to clotting and sealing the wound by converting fibrinogen into fibrin, reinforcing the primary platelet plug. Thrombin activity is regulated by antithrombin.
Fitusiran is a subcutaneously administered investigational RNA interference (RNAi) therapeutic targeting antithrombin with the goal of improving thrombin generation to promote clotting in people with hemophilia A or B with and without inhibitors. Fitusiran is currently being evaluated as a prophylactic agent for hemophilia A and B with and without inhibitors in an ongoing Phase 2 extension study. Breakthrough bleeds on the study are being managed using replacement factors (non-inhibitor patients) or bypassing agents (BPAs; inhibitor patients). The use of replacement factors or BPAs in the background of fitusiran treatment is of clinical interest and will be described.
Methods:
The Phase 2 extension study (NCT02554773) includes people with hemophilia A or B with and without inhibitors, previously dosed in the Phase 1 (NCT02035605) study. Participants receive monthly, fixed subcutaneous doses of fitusiran, 50 mg or 80 mg. Data on breakthrough bleeds and how they were treated were collected by patient diary.
Results:
As of May 2017, 33 participants were enrolled in the study. Previously reported data demonstrated that fitusiran was generally well tolerated and led to dose-dependent antithrombin lowering, thrombin generation increase, and decrease in bleeding frequency in participants with hemophilia A and B with or without inhibitors. Among those achieving target antithrombin lowering of >75%, few bleed events occurred during the observation period. Bleed events were treated with factor concentrates (FVIII or FIX) or bypassing agents (rFVIIa or aPCC), respectively, in doses according to or lower than recommended by the WFH guidelines. Detailed analyses of the frequency and management of bleed events in the Phase 2 study will be presented.
Conclusions:
Clinical data suggest that fitusiran may be a promising investigational prophylactic therapy to promote appropriate clotting and reduce the frequency of bleeding in people with hemophilia A or B with and without inhibitors. Further, the initial limited experience in treating breakthrough bleeds with replacement factor or BPAs has been encouraging, demonstrating good treatment effect in the absence of identified safety concerns.
Swimming is an important life skill that benefits hemophilia patients medically and psychosocially. The goal of this project is to provide inner city children and teenagers the opportunity to learn how to swim. The swim program will be held at the Detroit Medical Center, where a team of professionals will teach the basics of swimming with the goal of independent swimming by the end of the program. The team will measure the children's progress medically and psychosocially throughout the program. This program will provide children and teenagers at our HTC with an amazing opportunity and also a very important life skill. We will also be using adult hemophilia patients to teach the children how to swim, which will provide them with work experience and community involvement.
Objective:
Limited evidence supports activity-associated bleeding risk assessment for people with hemophilia (PWH), and consumer materials generically describe types of risk and a single activity risk score based on input from a few physical therapist (PT) authors. The aim of AIR was to assess activity-specific risk ranges, bleed-specific risks, and inherent/modifiable factors that increase risk based on survey/consensus of PT experts.
Methods:
Peer- nominated PTs from US hemophilia treatment centers (HTCs) were invited to participate in a survey regarding ~100 sports/recreational activities. For each activity, respondents provided a low (minimum) and high (maximum) risk assessment on a 5-point scale (low=1, high=5). Position-specific assessments were made for some team sports (eg, baseball pitcher, catcher, and field positions). Sports with distinctly different rules for contact were evaluated separately (eg, flag/tackle football, boys/girls lacrosse, Frisbee/ultimate). Drivers of risk were identified from free text comments and explored at a consensus meeting. Drivers of risk were categorized as inherent, modifiable, activity-driven, and patient-driven.
Summary:
Of 32 invited PTs, 17 responded to the survey with median 26.5 years as a PT and 15.5 years at an HTC; 8 participated in the full-day consensus meeting. Of the survey participants, majorities reported treating adults (94%) and treating children (88%), and most worked in the HTC full- time (29%) or nearly full-time (41%). Overall, few activities had low and high risk assessments both fall within the lower (1) or upper (5) end of the response range. For example, swimming is associated with low risk scores, even when including maximum risk with year-round competitive teams (median low 1, high 2), and tackle football had consistently high scores (median low 5, high 5). Risk scores (median low, high) for some common sports were as follows: baseball pitcher (3,4), catcher (3,4) or other position (2,3); basketball (2,4); hockey (4,5); skiing-downhill (2,4); soccer goalie (2,4) or other position (2,4); snowboarding (3,5). Risks for joint injuries were consistent with position and motion requirements for each sport, while head and muscle bleeds were associated with contact. Key drivers of risk that were identified included progression from seasonal participation to year-round play, overtraining, competitive level, participation in tournaments, and improper body mechanics. Inherent risks included impact with surface/ball/equipment (eg, soccer goalie), impact with players (eg, football), or falls (eg, horseback riding). Modifiable risks included tricks/stunts (eg, skateboarding) and use of safety equipment when not required.
Conclusion:
AIR provides insights into activity-specific risk for PWH including types of bleeding risk and drivers of increased risk. The results may provide a broader framework for assessing activities with respect to bleed site-specific risks and for recognizing how certain activities may be modified to decrease risk or to identify those with non-modifiable inherent risks for injury.
