Dr. Megan Rost is a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Michigan. She received a B.S in biochemistry and biotechnology from Michigan State University, and her Ph.D. in molecular and developmental biology at the University of Cincinnati - Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. Her graduate work focused on understanding vascular endothelial development using zebrafish as a model organism. In July 2015, she joined the lab of Dr. Jordan Shavit in the Department of Pediatrics and Hematology/Oncology at University of Michigan. For her 2016 JGP research fellowship project, she will be using the zebrafish model to analyze blood clot structure and function in the presence and absence of von Willebrand Factor. In studying this, Dr. Rost will be elucidating how arterial thrombus formation occurs in the absence of VWF, aiding in uncovering possible new therapeutic targets for VWD treatment.
Introduction and Objectives:
Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common bleeding disorder, affecting men and women equally. Despite this, awareness surrounding VWD is low. Outreach efforts often only target women, leaving many to assume VWD does not affect men. To begin changing this perception, the National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF) conducted a needs assessment to understand men’s awareness of VWD and experience getting a diagnosis for future programming.
Materials and Methods:
On behalf of NHF, The Harris Poll conducted a nationally representative online survey. From 2015 to 2016 1,002 adult men in the US were interviewed to learn about their health behaviors and awareness of VWD. A second online survey was conducted by NHF targeting men who were diagnosed with VWD to learn about their path to diagnosis and the impact of VWD on their lives. This survey was given to adult men in the US from 2016 to 2017 and 49 responses were included in the analysis.
Results:
The Harris Poll found that only 28% of men say they are aware of VWD and 68% are not sure of the symptoms. Medical providers (69%) are the main sources the men turned to for information about their health, followed by internet sources (40%). The second survey found an average of 8 years from first symptoms to final diagnosis, with almost 60% of respondents diagnosed at 18 years of age and older. When asked what motivated them to seek medical care, 45% cited a significant bleeding incident. Over half reported limitations to work, physical and social activity. Medical providers were one of the most common sources of information and support for men with VWD and the first place men went for information.
Conclusion:
More awareness of VWD is needed and outreach focused online and to medical providers. Diagnosed men need more education and support surrounding their disorder. NHF will continue to pursue outreach efforts and creation of resources for men with VWD.
Objective:
In the PROTECT VIII phase 2/3 trial, the extended–half-life recombinant factor VIII product BAY 94-9027 provided effective bleed protection with twice-weekly, every-5th-day, and every-7th-day prophylaxis for 36 weeks. Herein, we report interim efficacy data from the PROTECT VIII extension study in patients receiving BAY 94-9027 prophylaxis for up to 5.4 years.
Methods:
In the PROTECT VIII trial, previously treated males aged 12 to 65 years with severe hemophilia A received BAY 94-9027 for 36 weeks on demand or for prophylaxis either twice weekly (30–40 IU/kg), every 5 days (45–60 IU/kg), or every 7 days (60 IU/kg). Patients could continue in the extension study using the same or a different regimen. Bleeds were recorded in electronic patient diaries, and annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) were calculated.
Summary:
Of 134 patients enrolled in PROTECT VIII, 121 patients aged 15 to 67 years (median age, 40 years) at the data cutoff (January 2018) continued in the extension with either on-demand treatment (n=14) or prophylaxis (n=107). At the time of analysis, patients had spent a median of 3.9 years (range, 297–1965 days) in the study since enrollment, with a median of 223 (range, 23–563) exposure days. Median (quartile [Q] 1; Q3) ABR for total bleeds during the extension study was 34.1 (20.3; 36.6) for on-demand patients and 1.6 (0.3; 4.6) for prophylaxis patients. Median (Q1; Q3) ABR for joint bleeds was 0.9 (0; 3.3) for prophylaxis patients during the extension. Median (Q1; Q3) ABR for total bleeds during the extension was similar for patients receiving prophylaxis twice weekly (1.7 [0.8; 3.6]; n=23), every 5 days (1.2 [0; 4.6]; n=33), and every 7 days (0.7 [0; 1.6]; n=23); among patients who switched prophylaxis frequency during the extension (n=28), total ABR was 3.1 (1.2; 6.2). Compared with the main study, ABR during the extension was further reduced in patients who remained in their treatment arm, including patients receiving prophylaxis every 7 days (median [Q1; Q3] main study ABR for total bleeds, 0.96 [0; 4.3]) . Of patients receiving prophylaxis, 20.6% had zero bleeds during the extension. No safety issues were identified.
Conclusions:
Good bleeding control was maintained with BAY 94-9027 prophylaxis with extended intervals of every 5 days and every 7 days throughout the PROTECT VIII extension study for up to >5 years.