Research Studies

Objective:

BAY 94-9027 is an extended–half-life recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) product. Efficacy in maintaining hemostasis during major surgery was evaluated in a subset of patients with severe hemophilia A in the phase 2/3 PROTECT VIII study.

Methods:

Patients aged 12–65 years requiring major surgery during PROTECT VIII or its ongoing extension were included in the analysis. Patients with severe hemophilia A undergoing major surgery who were not enrolled in PROTECT VIII but met all study inclusion and exclusion criteria also were eligible to participate. BAY 94-9027 dosing during the perioperative period was based on preoperative pharmacokinetic measurements and adjusted at the physician’s discretion. Types of procedures and duration of surgeries, BAY 94-9027 consumption on the day of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, surgeon assessment of hemostasis during surgery, and need for blood transfusion were evaluated.

Summary:

17 patients (median [range] age, 37 [13–61] years) underwent 20 major surgeries, including 15 orthopedic surgeries (9 joint replacements [hip, n=1; knee, n=6; ankle, n=2], 2 open synovectomies, 3 arthroscopies, and 1 thigh hematoma evacuation), 3 complex dental extractions, 1 penile prosthesis, and 1 inguinal hernia repair at data cutoff (January 2015). Median (range) surgical duration was 102 (17‒217) minutes, and median (range) total dose used on day of surgery, including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative infusions on that day, was 72.4 (43‒136) IU/kg. Median (range) number of FVIII infusions on the day of surgery was 2 (1–3), with 40% of procedures requiring only 1 infusion (preoperative) on that day. Following a median (range) presurgical dose of 52.1 (41–64) IU/kg, the median (range) FVIII level (chromogenic assay; measured in a central laboratory) immediately before the second infusion was 71.6 (44–140) IU/dL; median (range) time between the presurgical and second infusions was 12.3 (3.6–50.0) hours. Hemostasis during surgery was good (13/20; 65%) or excellent (7/20; 35%) for all procedures. Intraoperative blood loss was within expected ranges for all surgeries (median [range], 50 [0–1000] mL), and blood transfusions were required in 4 patients undergoing knee surgeries.

Conclusions:

BAY 94-9027 is efficacious in maintaining hemostasis during major surgeries in adolescents and adults with severe hemophilia A. Excellent or good hemostasis with blood loss as expected was achieved in all surgical procedures, which included major orthopedic surgeries (75% of all procedures), with 40% of patients requiring only a single infusion of BAY 94-9027 on the day of surgery.

Objective:

The impact of hemophilia on working life, the ability to pursue a desired career or sustain full employment have been previously reported. The aim of this analysis was to seek a better understanding of hemophilia-related health problems likely to impact employment.

Methods:

The analysis utilized data from the Patient Reported Outcomes Burdens and Experience (PROBE) study. Participants selected from among 7 possible responses (working full-time, working part-time, student full-time, student part-time, long-term disability, early retirement and other (e.g., unemployed, parental leave, retired)) to describe their current employment or school status. People with severe hemophilia A and B (PwSH) and controls with no bleeding disorder (NoBD) were compared for the proportion (percentage) reporting either working part-time due to their health or having retired early due to their health, the proportion reporting working full-time. Descriptive statistics were used to present the results as n (%), and odds ratio (95% CI) were calculated for the associations and assessed for their statistical significance.

Summary:

Data from 1009 participants (550 PwSH, 458 NoBD) ≥age 18 from 21 countries was analyzed. Mean age of participants was 39 (14.4 SD) for PwSH and 45.3 (13.7 SD) for NoBD. 250 PwSH (45.5%) and 263 NoBD (57.4%) reported working full time; 86 PwSH (15.6%) and 80 NoBD (17.5%) reported working part-time. 27 of the 86 PwSH (31.4%) and 3 of the 80 NoBD (3.8%) reported working part-time due to health. 52 PwSH (9.5%) and 28 NoBD (6.1%) reported taking early retirement. 25 of the 52 PwSH (48.1%) and 1 of the 28 NoBD (3.6%) reported taking early retirement due to health. Analysis of the association between reporting a health-related problem and reporting to be working part-time or taking early retirement due to health include [odds ratio (95% CI), positive numbers indicating #times higher chance of being part-time/retired early]: use of mobility aids 77.7 (3.8-1645), acute or chronic pain 41.2 (2-831.8), use of pain medication 23 (2.05-258.1), participants with any health problems 22.5 (2-252.6), chronic pain 16.5 (1.5-179.2), difficulties with activities of daily living 16.5 (1.5-179.2), and history of joint surgery 7.3 (0.4-148).

Conclusion:

PwSH are more likely to report working part-time or having taken early retirement due to health-related problems than people with NoBD. Among the study population, we find a significant negative impact of hemophilia on employment status. PwSH is associated with a higher rate of working part-time or retiring early due to health than age-matched controls. Use of mobility aids, acute and chronic pain, difficulties with activities of daily living and history of joint surgery are associated with working part-time or retiring early.

Dr. Shi is a Professor of Pediatric Hematology at the Medical College of Wisconsin and an Investigator of Blood Research Institute at the BloodCenter of Wisconsin. She earned her MD from Fujian Medical University in China in 1990 and her Ph.D. in 1998. Dr. Shi’s research focus is to formulate innovative therapeutic approaches for the treatment of hemophilia A, a genetic bleeding disorder caused by a lack of the critical blood clotting protein, factor VIII (FVIII). One of her research programs funded by the National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, is to develop platelet-specific gene transfer strategies for the treatment of hemophilia A and hemophilia A with neutralizing antibodies. In the project supported by the NHF Bridge Grant, Dr. Shi will investigate the potential effect of the FVIII carrier protein, von Willebrand factor, on FVIII immune responses in hemophilia A. Dr. Shi expects that results from her studies will aid the design of more effective protocols to prevent FVIII immune responses and to induce FVIII immune tolerance in patients with HA.

Objective:

BAY 94-9027 is an extended–half-life recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) product. In the PROTECT VIII Kids trial, BAY 94-9027 was efficacious for the prevention and treatment of bleeding episodes in previously treated children with severe hemophilia A. We report interim long-term efficacy and safety data from the PROTECT VIII Kids extension study.

Methods:

In PROTECT VIII Kids, previously treated patients (PTPs) aged <12 years with severe hemophilia A received BAY 94-9027 prophylaxis twice weekly (25‒60 IU/kg), every 5 days (45‒60 IU/kg), or every 7 days (60 IU/kg). Patients completing ≥50 exposure days (EDs) and ≥6 months in the main study or a 12-week safety substudy (part 2) that enrolled PTPs aged <6 years could continue in the optional extension for an additional ≥50 EDs.

Summary:

Fifty-nine of 73 patients treated with BAY 94-9027 in PROTECT VIII Kids (main study or part 2) continued in the extension (median [range] age at enrollment in the main study, 5.0 [2–11] years). At data cutoff (January 2018), patients had a median (range) of 1456 (351–1665) days in the trial (main study or part 2 plus extension). Patients in the extension received prophylaxis twice weekly (n=20), every 5 days (n=20), every 7 days (n=8), or switched prophylaxis frequency during the extension (variable frequency; n=11). Median (range) dose/infusion was 52.1 (19–62) IU/kg. Median annualized bleeding rate (ABR) for total bleeds was 1.8 for all patients and 0.8, 1.1, 2.1, and 3.2 for those treated twice weekly, every 5 days, every 7 days, or with varying frequency, respectively. Median ABR for joint bleeds in all patients was 0.7. During the extension, 3 patients (5.1%) experienced treatment-related adverse events (AEs) classified as mild (n=1), moderate (n=1), or severe (n=1). One patient discontinued because of a serious AE that was not related to treatment. No confirmed FVIII inhibitors or anti-PEG antibodies were observed; no patients had sustained levels of detectable PEG in plasma.

Conclusions:

Long-term treatment (up to ~4.5 years) with BAY 94-9027 prophylaxis was efficacious and well tolerated in previously treated pediatric patients with severe hemophilia A.

Objective:

The Evolving Treatment of Hemophilia’s Impact on Neurodevelopment, Intelligence and Other Cognitive Functions (eTHINK) study aims to evaluate the impact of hemophilia on neurodevelopment and cognitive function through the use of validated instruments and to identify covariates that drive differences in neuropsychological performance.

Methods:

A sample of at least 510 males aged 1-21 years (~25 per age) with hemophilia A or B (any severity, with or without inhibitors) will be enrolled in a cross-sectional, non-interventional study. Following ethics review and informed consent, data collected will include a structured developmental and hemophilia history interview, a standardized neurologic examination, and a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment of cognitive/motor development (Bayley-III), intelligence (WPPSI-IV/WASI-II), attention/processing speed (CogState™), executive function (BRIEF-P/BRIEF2/BRIEF-A), mood and behavior (BASC-3), and adaptive behavior (ABAS-3). Assessments will include objective tests as well as parent and patient self-report rating scales. Z scores will be derived from published general population norms for each instrument and analyzed to develop hemophilia population specific norms. Secondary analysis for predictors of outcome will include regression modeling and chi-square tests of top vs bottom quartile responses.

Summary:

Initiated in the early 1990s under Centers for Disease Control, Maternal and Child Health Bureau, and National Institutes of Health, the Hemophilia Growth and Development Study (HGDS) evaluated the impact of hemophilia on neurodevelopment, executive function, and intelligence. The 4-year observational study enrolled 333 patients from 14 US centers, aged 6-18 years at baseline (62% HIV+), who underwent annual/semi-annual comprehensive assessments including neurologic examination, neuroimaging (MRI), and neuropsychological assessment. Results suggested that hemophilia and HIV had independent effects at baseline and follow-up. Baseline neurologic examination findings were common, as were progressive abnormalities of gait/coordination. Imaging showed baseline CNS bleeds in 12% of patients and new CNS bleeds (2% per year), which often occurred in the absence of reported head trauma. HIV+ children were more likely to show lower scores on neuropsychological assessments. Academic/adaptive skills were lower than expected based on mean IQ, and more behavioral/emotional problems were seen, including attention abnormalities related to known/silent CNS bleeds. There was a large shift in mean scores in IQ and achievement for the children with more severe hemophilia. Six small studies published between 1996 and 2009 reported impacts on academic achievement, attention, and behavior.

Conclusions:

HGDS established 25 years ago that hemophilia and HIV have independent effects on cognitive and behavioral function in children with hemophilia. Since then, standards of care in hemophilia treatment have changed significantly, but no follow-up studies have investigated whether these changes have affected the profile of neurocognitive outcomes in hemophilia. We therefore designed the eTHINK study to provide valuable insights into whether subgroups of children and young adults with hemophilia remain at risk for impaired neuropsychological outcomes.

Objective:

We sought to explore real-world outcomes, such as annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and markers of adherence, in persons with hemophilia A (PwHA) or with hemophilia B (PwHB) who receive standard half-life (SHL) or extended half-life (EHL) factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) replacement products.

Methods:

We analyzed de-identified data from the Adelphi Disease Specific Programme (DSP) database, a patient health record–based survey of hematologists in the US and 5 European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK). Data were collected from May–November 2017 for male patients with moderate or severe HA or HB. Outcomes in the two groups of patients (SHL vs EHL) were compared and descriptive statistics were used to summarize results.

Summary:

A sample of 595 patients with HA or HB met the inclusion criteria (US, n=123; Europe, n=472). Age, weight, and body mass index (BMI) were similar between SHL and EHL groups for PwHA and PwHB on both continents. Higher ABR was noted consistently in Europe vs the US. Hemophilia A: Analysis included 101 patients from the US (SHL, n=64; EHL, n=37) and 360 patients from Europe (SHL, n=340; EHL, n=20). The ABR was similar between both groups on both continents (median: US, 1.0 SHL and 1.0 EHL; Europe, 1.0 SHL and 1.5 EHL; mean: US, 1.3 SHL and 1.2 EHL, P=0.68; Europe, 1.8 SHL and 1.7 EHL, P=0.76). The mean of the physician-reported ‘number of doses missed of the last 10 doses’ appeared to be numerically higher in the EHL vs the SHL group in the US (mean: 0.4 SHL and 1.6 EHL, P=0.13), whereas in Europe, the trend was reversed (mean: 0.7 SHL and 0.0 EHL, P=0.29). Hemophilia B: Analysis included 22 patients from the US (10 SHL; 12 EHL) and 112 patients from Europe (91 SHL; 21 EHL). The median ABR for PwHA and PwHB in the US was 1.0 (SHL) and 1.0 (EHL), and the mean was 1.6 SHL and 0.8 EHL (P=0.25); in Europe, the median ABR was 2.0 SHL and 1.0 EHL, and the mean was 2.2 SHL and 1.6 EHL, P=0.25. The mean of the physician-reported ‘number of doses missed of the last 10 doses’ was 0.8 SHL and 0.5 EHL (P=0.63) in the US and 0.6 SHL and 0.1 EHL (P=0.33) in Europe.

Conclusions:

These preliminary real-world data, unadjusted for treatment regimen and inclusive of US and ex-US sampling, showed no clinically meaningful difference in ABR or adherence markers in PwHA or PwHB who received SHL versus EHL FVIII or FIX products. These observations may challenge assumptions regarding adherence and or clinical outcomes associated with SHL/EHL product selection among PwHA and PwHB. Further analyses should be explored.

Per Dr. Kumar, the JGP Fellowship has enabled him to test his ideas related to factor V biology. It has facilitated his scientific training to become increasingly independent in the planning and execution of his research. Important to note, findings generated from these studies have provided new concepts and tools to target factor V for therapeutic purposes. After the completion of his award in 2018, Dr. Kumar would like to continue his career in the field of hematology.

Dr. Jessica Garcia is currently a pediatric hematology/oncology fellow at the Medical College of Wisconsin/Children's Hospital of Wisconsin. Her clinical mentor is Dr. Joan Gill, Director of the Comprehensive Center for Bleeding Disorders (CCBD) in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.  Dr. Garcia's primary research mentor will be Dr. Veronica Flood, with Dr. Bob Montgomery as her secondary research mentor. Dr. Garcia attended medical school and completed her pediatric residency at the University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria/Children's Hospital of Illinois. During her pediatric residency, Dr. Garcia worked with Dr. de Alarcon studying the mechanisms underlying the thrombocytosis seen with iron deficiency anemia in an animal model. As a NHF-Baxalta Clinical Fellow, Dr. Garcia will receive specialized training in hemostasis and thrombosis, available through the Comprehensive Center for Bleeding Disorders (CCBD) and Blood Research Institute (BRI). Her research will focus on the biology of von Willebrand factor.

Dr. Yasmina Abajas is a clinical assistant professor in pediatric hematology/oncology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where she also completed her subspecialty training in 2016. A native of Miami, FL, she attended medical school at the University of Miami and completed her pediatrics residency at the University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital. During her fellowship training, she focused on studying hemophilia B inhibitors in a humanized mouse model under the mentorship of Dr. Paul Monahan. As a NHF- Baxalta Clinical Fellow, Dr. Abajas will work on transitioning her efforts from bench research to a translational/clinical research focus under the mentorship of Nigel Key, MB ChB, FRCP, section chief of hematology and director of the Hemophilia Treatment Center at UNC Chapel Hill. Dr. Abajas will continue to focus on FIX inhibitors and evaluate whether or not a combined B and T cell immunosuppressive regimen helps with inhibitor eradication in affected hemophilia B patients.

Objective:

This study assessed current clinical practices of clinicians related to hemophilia treatment guidelines to identify knowledge, competency, practice gaps and barriers to optimal care of patients with inhibitors.

Methods:

A continuing medical education (CME)-certified clinical practice assessment survey was developed comprising 24 knowledge- and case-based, multiple-choice questions. The survey assessed knowledge, attitudes, and confidence with regard to newly-developed hemophilia treatment guidelines emphasizing integrated care for patients with inhibitors, and the application of these guideline-based recommendations. The survey launched on the Medscape Education website on December 5, 2016 with participant responses collected through January 26, 2017. The data sample includes responses from 170 physicians who participated during the study period.

Summary of Results (n=170 physicians):

Responses to questions on the screening for, and management of, inhibitor formation in patients with hemophilia undergoing prophylaxis, showed that: the majority of hematologists/oncologists correctly identified the factors that increase risk of inhibitor formation (71%), while less than half of pediatricians did so (46%); when asked regarding exposure days (EDs) and the formation of inhibitors, half of hematologists/oncologists correctly identified within 50 EDs, while only 25% of pediatricians did so; and both hematologists/oncologists (21%) and pediatricians (28%) incorrectly identified how often a patient should be tested for inhibitors. When surveyed specifically regarding immune tolerance induction (ITI), a slight majority of hematologists/oncologists and pediatricians correctly chose the time frame during which to initiate ITI (55% and 51%, respectively), and 50% of hematologists/oncologists knew the most powerful predictor of ITI success, while only 42% of pediatricians did so; only 14% of hematologists/oncologists and 4% of pediatricians knew that there is no optimal rFVIII to initiate for ITI; only 10% of hematologists/oncologists and 8% of pediatricians knew that there is not optimal dose of rFVIII to initiate for ITI.

Conclusions:

The need for further education was observed for the following topics: best practices in the integrative care of patients using evidence-based guidelines and recommendations; current and emerging clinical data guiding acute and prophylactic management; risk factors for the development of inhibitors during prophylaxis; screening and management of inhibitor formation, including ITI. Further educational efforts tailored to address these gaps are warranted.

Objectives:

To better understand what symptoms beyond bleeds are experienced, as well as the depth of impact of these symptoms and how they uniquely impact people living with hemophilia on a daily basis. Additionally, the study aims to better understand patients’ satisfaction with current treatments in addressing their hemophilia needs.

Design/Method:

An email invitation was sent to all U.S. members affiliated with hemophilia A of MyHemophiliaTeam, a social network of people diagnosed with or caring for someone with hemophilia. 54 members responded to a 24 question survey between April 19 and May 1, 2017.

Results:

Hemophilia had a significant negative impact on the day-to-day life of adults (72%) and children (52%). Pain was the most broadly and acutely experienced symptom: 60% of adults and 28% of caregivers felt that pain had a major impact on their lives and 33% of adults and 25% of caregivers considered mobility to be significantly impacted by hemophilia.

For adults, both pain and mobility limitations impacted sleep (71% and 45%, respectively), being able to perform chores (71% and 65%), and the ability to work (48% and 45%). For children, these conditions impacted school attendance (61% and 58%) and participation in high impact activities like running or playing soccer (56% and 75%).

Depression and anxiety were also common symptoms that impacted sleep across adults (71%, 61%) and children (60%, 55%). Adults most commonly reported feeling negative ones: stress (38%), fatigue (38%) and annoyance (35%).

81% of adults and 86% of caregivers were extremely or very satisfied with current treatment. However, needs beyond treating bleeds are currently not being met. Few felt their pain was adequately addressed by current therapies (74% of adults and 57% of children reported no relief). Mobility impairment issues were also not being adequately addressed. Time spent on treatment impacted people with hemophilia (39% of adults and 43% of children, respectively were not satisfied with the frequency of treatment).

Background:

While people with hemophilia are known to suffer from bleeding, numerous concomitant symptoms also burden these patients, including pain, mobility impairments, depression, and anxiety. These symptoms can have a significant impact on quality of life, limiting work and school attendance, causing social withdrawal, and encouraging inactivity. Additionally, available treatment options can sometimes fall short in treating the totality of hemophilia symptoms.

Conclusions:

People with hemophilia have many challenges beyond bleeds that are not currently being well addressed. This is particularly true for the pain experienced. As such, a more holistic approach to treating hemophilia beyond bleeds would be beneficial to patients living with hemophilia. Additionally, therapies that reduce the need and frequency for treatment could potentially lower the burden of disease.

Objectives:

The primary aims of this study are to 1) evaluate the prevalence of depression and anxiety among adult persons with hemophilia (PWH) and 2) explore relationships between depression, anxiety, chronic pain, and adherence to clotting-factor treatment.

Method:

This study used a subset of data from the IMPACT QoL II, a one-time, cross-sectional survey of 200 adults (age >18) with self-reported diagnosis of either Hemophilia A or B who were able to read, write, and speak English. The study was approved by the IRB in the primary investigator’s institution. Participants were a convenience sample recruited at bleeding disorders conferences in 2013-2014 and issued a randomly generated identification number to ensure anonymity. The 139-item survey was completed electronically through SurveyMonkeyTM on a study computer tablet. Participants were given $20 upon completion of the survey, which took 15-45 minutes to complete. The subset of variables evaluated for this analysis included the Faces of Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) (chronic pain), level of control over pain each participant feels they have, adherence to clotting factor measured by total scores (higher score=lower adherence) on the VERITAS-PRO or VERITAS-PRN, anxiety measured by the GAD- 7, depression measured by the PHQ-9, and self-report of ever receiving a diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety. The cut-off score for presence of moderate to severe depression or anxiety was 10 on both the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7, scores which have been validated by previous literature in other populations. Lower vs. higher adherence was defined by VERITAS scores in the highest and lowest quartile respectively.

Summary:

Participants with lower treatment adherence (VERITAS score >57) were more likely to have PHQ-9 scores >10 (P=0.02). GAD-7 scores >10 also demonstrated a trend to be associated with lower treatment adherence (P=0.15). 28% of participants reported a diagnosis of depression, but 53% with PHQ-9 scores >10 had not been diagnosed with depression. Similarly, 22% reported a diagnosis of anxiety but 52% with GAD-7 scores >10 had not been diagnosed. Participants who reported non-control of pain were more likely to have PHQ-9 scores or GAD-7 scores >10 (P=0.001 and P=0.013 respectively). There were significant correlations between PHQ-9 and GAD-7 (Rho=0.76, P<0.0001), PHQ-9 and FPS-R (chronic pain) (Rho=0.31, P=0.003), and GAD-7 and VERITAS (P=0.005). These data indicate that depression and anxiety are associated with greater severity of chronic pain, and depression is associated with poorer adherence to clotting factor treatment regimen (prophylaxis or other regimen). Both depression and anxiety appear to be under-diagnosed in PWH.

Objective:

To identify sociodemographic, clinical and treatment characteristics associated with the quality of life (QoL) of individuals with hemophilia B (HB) using longitudinal data in the HUGS Vb cohort.

Methods:

Between 2009-2012, 148 persons with HB were enrolled into HUGS Vb, a prospective cohort study examining individuals seen at ten federally supported U.S. hemophilia treatment centers (HTCs). Participants or parents of pediatric enrollees completed periodic surveys; data from 107 individuals with at least three follow-up surveys, clinician charts and dispensing records were included in the analyses. Data were analyzed at baseline and 6-month intervals across 2 years, yielding 5 time points. Periodic QoL assessments (SF-12 for adults and PedsQL for children), self-reported pain, employment and insurance status, time lost from work/school and treatment regimen were collected. Descriptive statistics and Spearman’s correlation coefficient test were used to examine the associations.

Summary:

Forty-six percent of the sample had severe HB; 50% were children (2-17 years). Among those with severe HB, 64% of children and 50% of adults treated prophylactically. 58% of adults were employed full-time. Individuals with mild hemophilia missed more work/school days due to disease-related issues (8 days) than those with moderate hemophilia (2 days) or severe hemophilia (3 days, P=0.03). QoL scores were similar over time among those using prophylactic and on-demand treatment for both adults and children. Median adult Mental Component Scores (MCS) and Physical Component Scores (PCS) measured at 5 time points ranged from 53.0 to 55.1 for MCS and 45.5 to 50.5 for PCS, with no significant changes observed over time. However, adults employed full-time had significantly higher median PCS at each time point than those working less than full-time (all Ps<0.05). Adults who reported pain had significantly lower median PCS than those who reported no pain/pain only when bleeding at each time point (all Ps<0.03). Median MCS remained similar between the two groups. Overall, we observed no longitudinal differences in children’s total PedsQL scores (range of median: 81.2-92.4) or in functioning subscales. However, among 18 children with QoL scores at both baseline and 24 months, missed school days were significantly correlated with decreased social functioning over time (rho=0.73, P<0.001). 8% of children who reported pain had consistently lower median total QoL scores than those reporting no pain/pain only when bleeding, despite having access to insurance and prophylactic treatment.

Conclusions:

Longitudinal data collected by HUGS Vb provide a valuable opportunity to examine the association of HB patient characteristics with measures of QoL in a multi-state sample. These data demonstrate that lower QoL was consistently associated over time with multiple factors, including absence from school, unemployment and pain. Continued analysis of this cohort will increase our understanding of the challenges faced by persons with HB.

Objective:

My Life, Our Future (MLOF) seeks to advance understanding of hemophilia by developing the MLOF Research Repository, a resource for use in scientific study. To strengthen the database and improve clinical care for females, MLOF expanded in 2016 to collect data and samples from potential and confirmed carriers.

Methods:

MLOF is a collaboration between the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network (ATHN) (educates HCPs, collects and protects genetic data, manages ATHNdataset, manages research review committee), Bloodworks Northwest (BWNW) (performs genetic testing and analysis, manages MLOF Research Repository), National Hemophilia Foundation (educates patients and the community), and Bioverativ (provides scientific collaboration and sponsorship). Patients enrolled in MLOF can contribute their de-identified clinical information and specimens (DNA, RNA, plasma and serum) to the MLOF Research Repository. The patients’ hemophilic genetic data (F8 or F9 variant) and specimens are stored at BWNW and their clinical data in the ATHNdataset. For carrier project participants, an ISTH Bleeding Assessment Tool score is determined, and for confirmed carriers factor levels are obtained and recorded in ATHN Clinical Manager. Upon enrollment of 5,000 participants, the MLOF Research Repository was opened to U.S-based investigators in February 2017. Investigators were encouraged to partner with a participating hemophilia treatment center (HTC) on projects for clinical translational support. An independent, international, multidisciplinary panel of experts was convened to review research proposals, evaluating project feasibility, scientific merit and potential contribution to the bleeding disorders community.

Summary:

To date, 97 HTCs are actively participating in MLOF and have enrolled 8,246 patients. Of those, 83% (6,857), including 723 confirmed carriers, have consented to research. The samples of 427 additional females consenting to research are pending evaluation; 1,643 females have participated in MLOF. The first MLOF Research Repository cycle received 9 Letters of Intent and 7 were chosen for full proposal review. The final selection of studies will be announced to the community in June 2017.

Conclusions:

Combining and analyzing genetic and clinical data via this database may allow researchers to solve unmet needs in patients with hemophilia, including understanding inhibitor development, bleeding severity or aiding in identifying new therapeutic targets. By considering molecular drivers of disease and genetic variability, this approach could lead to more individualized treatment through advancement of precision medicine. Global expansion of the MLOF Research Repository is planned for 2018. Carrier testing may help females manage their bleeding disorder and may aid in family planning. Related to research, females provide a unique control group for males with hemophilia on natural history, modifier genes inside and outside the coagulation system, and epigenetic factors affecting outcomes.

Objective:

Patients with hereditary bleeding disorders have been included in Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of sofosbuvir (SOF), ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) as well as in a dedicated study (n = 120) in this patient population. This integrated analysis evaluates the safety and efficacy of SOF-based regimens in HCV-infected patients with hereditary bleeding disorders.

Methods:

HCV-infected patients with a medical history of a hereditary bleeding disorder who participated in a SOF-based Phase 2 or 3 study were included in this pooled analysis. Medical history term(s) used to identify patients with bleeding disorders included variations of Hemophilia A or B, Von Willebrand’s Disease, Factor Deficiencies, or conditions associated with hemophilia.

Summary:

A total of 201 patients (74 GT1, 10% GT2, 14% GT3, 2% GT4, <1% GT5) with bleeding disorders were identified across 19 studies. The majority were male (91%), Caucasian (82%), IL28B non-CC (70%), HCV treatment-naïve (55%), and without cirrhosis (74%). Hemophilia A (65%) and B (26%) were the most common bleeding disorders. SVR12 results are shown in the below table by treatment regimen and genotype. The most frequently reported adverse events (>10%) were fatigue and headache; majority were mild or moderate in severity. One patient (<1%) discontinued LDV/SOF due to an adverse event and 11 patients (5%) experienced a serious adverse event. Hemarthrosis, muscle hemorrhage, epistaxis, hematoma, and hematuria were the only hemorrhagic events that occurred in >1 patient. Grade 3 or 4 laboratory abnormalities were infrequent with anemia and hyperbilirubinemia the most frequent Grade 3 laboratory abnormality consistent with RBV administration.

Conclusions:

SOF-based regimens led to high rates of SVR in genotype 1–5 HCV infected patients with bleeding disorders. SOF-based regimens were safe and well tolerated with no new toxicity specific to patients with bleeding disorders emerging
.

Swimming is an important life skill that benefits hemophilia patients medically and psychosocially. The goal of this project is to provide inner city children and teenagers the opportunity to learn how to swim. The swim program will be held at the Detroit Medical Center, where a team of professionals will teach the basics of swimming with the goal of independent swimming by the end of the program. The team will measure the children's progress medically and psychosocially throughout the program. This program will provide children and teenagers at our HTC with an amazing opportunity and also a very important life skill. We will also be using adult hemophilia patients to teach the children how to swim, which will provide them with work experience and community involvement.

Background:

Hemophilia is an inherited bleeding disorder caused by an impairment in the body’s ability to accomplish the natural clotting process. People with hemophilia experience bleeds because there is an inadequate amount of thrombin due to a deficiency in factor VIII or IX. Thrombin is critical to clotting and sealing the wound by converting fibrinogen into fibrin, reinforcing the primary platelet plug. Thrombin activity is regulated by antithrombin.

Fitusiran is a subcutaneously administered investigational RNA interference (RNAi) therapeutic targeting antithrombin with the goal of improving thrombin generation to promote clotting in people with hemophilia A or B with and without inhibitors. Fitusiran is currently being evaluated as a prophylactic agent for hemophilia A and B with and without inhibitors in an ongoing Phase 2 extension study. Breakthrough bleeds on the study are being managed using replacement factors (non-inhibitor patients) or bypassing agents (BPAs; inhibitor patients). The use of replacement factors or BPAs in the background of fitusiran treatment is of clinical interest and will be described.

Methods:

The Phase 2 extension study (NCT02554773) includes people with hemophilia A or B with and without inhibitors, previously dosed in the Phase 1 (NCT02035605) study. Participants receive monthly, fixed subcutaneous doses of fitusiran, 50 mg or 80 mg. Data on breakthrough bleeds and how they were treated were collected by patient diary.

Results:

As of May 2017, 33 participants were enrolled in the study. Previously reported data demonstrated that fitusiran was generally well tolerated and led to dose-dependent antithrombin lowering, thrombin generation increase, and decrease in bleeding frequency in participants with hemophilia A and B with or without inhibitors. Among those achieving target antithrombin lowering of >75%, few bleed events occurred during the observation period. Bleed events were treated with factor concentrates (FVIII or FIX) or bypassing agents (rFVIIa or aPCC), respectively, in doses according to or lower than recommended by the WFH guidelines. Detailed analyses of the frequency and management of bleed events in the Phase 2 study will be presented.

Conclusions:

Clinical data suggest that fitusiran may be a promising investigational prophylactic therapy to promote appropriate clotting and reduce the frequency of bleeding in people with hemophilia A or B with and without inhibitors. Further, the initial limited experience in treating breakthrough bleeds with replacement factor or BPAs has been encouraging, demonstrating good treatment effect in the absence of identified safety concerns.